Custom Search

Share |

Update: It’s good! Miley Cyrus BJ picture is fake, Contact Music is reporting her rep said:

“The alleged photo of Miley Cyrus circulating the internet is completely fabricated.”

***

Probably not as we originally thought, Miley Cyrus might be indeed hit by yet another photo scandal. Miley Cyrus has done so many good jobs, her singing and acting have indisputably made her the adorned heartthrob for many teens both inside and outside of USA.

However, Miley Cyrus’ image could have be seriously blowed up for an extremely bad “job” (BJ) if she would confess to having done so. The latest Miley Cyrus BJ photo leaked spread on the internet really is of bad taste. It was said the problematic picture was taken on a Blackberry 9000 handphone (Miley Cyrus has a similar model).

Miley Cyrus Leaked Bj PictureThe censored version of Miley Cyrus BJ picture in a montage image (above) posted on many blog posts was described as faked and photoshopped. Many readers (me also) believed what those gossip sites said was true, but still a lot (some of them had checked the EXIF data of original uncensored Miley Cyrus BJ photos) didn’t think so , read their comments below:

From thepaparazzis.com

john wesley on June 16, 2009 6:33 am

Also, the other proof that it isn’t fake is that it has artifacts over it at full resolution.

This picture posted here is the PROOF originally made as a comparison to the picture of the deed.

greger on June 16, 2009 6:25 am

Nope, it is real. This montage shows two different pictures and the mouths are different.

Besides, if you study the EXIF data from the original photo that was leaked, you will find out that the picture was taken with a blackberry 9000.

EXIF data cannot be edited if the picture it self is not edited..

Anon on June 16, 2009 6:09 am

It’s not f@#$ing fake, that photo proves that its not, if you had any photoshop skills at all you would realise this.

Someone on June 16, 2009 8:31 am

I have a few points on this.

1: That photo was not made to and does not prove that the photo is a fake. If you bothered to look at the cheeks, you will realise that the actual cheeks in the photo are puffier than in either of the “proof” photos.

2: EXIF Data shows it was taken with the same model camera as the previous photo’s leaked by TrainReq.

Please learn these things before jumping to assumptions about a person because you wish to defend them.

~ Someone


ok on June 16, 2009 9:24 am

you took this set of photos from another website and didn’t even understand what you were looking at.

This is proof that the photo is real, not that it is fake.

Jane on June 16, 2009 11:29 am

It’s not fake! The pictures on that image are there to prove that none of the faces match up with the one Miley is making while giving a blow job.

Did you not look at the pictures before you posted? Did you even understand what you were supposed to look at before posting this?

From inquisitr.com

yeah 3 hours ago

you got it backwards.

This is a photo montage somebody else posted in order to show that it WASN’T fake.

These other photos were posted to show that the face in the picture is indeed Miley Cyrus, as they look very much like her.

anonymous 3 hours ago

That pic was made AFTER the original miley cyrus BJ photo appeared on the internet! To compare her face structure to the one on the photo!


Anonymous 2 hours ago

What “yeah” said some 33 minutes ago, plus the original “BJ” image’s EXIF data, which corresponds with the other leaked shots perfectly.

THE PICTURE IS REAL. THE MONTAGE WAS DONE TO SHOW SIMILARITY OF FACIAL FEATURES.

wowseriously 2 hours ago

wow you people are seriously brain dead.

the montage was put together by the people trying to prove this was legit!

find me someone who can take the picture on the top left and turn it into the actual blow job pic, and i’ll die of shock. its to show the facial structure is the same.

there is data taken from mrs.b-lowJ’s twitter pics that show it is taken with a blackberry, just like the data from the original b-lowjob pic shows as well.

From Digg.com:

MrsGlasoe

Man, that totally looks like her. I can’t help but be mortified!

joshthegreat200

If you can find the “full” version of the picture (which at this point is not hard at all), its clearly her.

Veryabsurd

saw the uncensored version and it certainly looks like her, especially her mouthparts. poor miley cyrus, her dad’s gonna be heart-broken. (i resisted the impulse to make an achy-breaky heart reference. hold your applause.)

As of the time this second post on the Miley Cyrus BJ leaked picture was entered, no comments were seen from Miley’s rep nor Cyrus herself. We’ll keep you posted if anything happens, we indeed hope Miley Cyrus BJ photo is a hoax.

Read Also:


Custom Search

8 Responses to “Miley Cyrus BJ Photo Is Real, Not Photoshopped? We Hope The Backwards (Update)”

  1. shane says:

    it cant possibly be fake im not proving this by a tonne of hard computer work but photo shop dosent edit videos aswell because the picture is hardly going to be fake if i even saw a video and if anyone is looking to see this video email me and i will try get back

    Email:shanegarvin@hotmail.com

  2. amanda says:

    i dont know anyone that makes that face while giving a bj. yall are stupid 12 year old . seriously.

  3. Shannon says:

    that is photoshopped. i photoshop sh* all the time. all you f* that are saying ”OMG ITS SO NOT FAKE! SHES A SLUT” get a life. you obviously dont know photoshopped sh*. the pictures are clearly the same. and whoever did photoshop that, needs a life.

  4. C.E.H. Special Agent says:

    listen here ppl the video is fake it’s a miley cyrus look alike not her if you look at miley and then the video you’ll see a lot of diffrences

  5. anonymous says:

    I am a Photoshop expert I create all kinds of effects in photos and have years of experience but I could NOT recreate this photo out of the two “PROOF” photos , and the EXIF data cannot be edited in any way I can definately confirm that MILEY herself did take the photo and that it was not a Photoshop if it were a Photoshop then the DATA would say so because it couldn’t be edited

  6. SOME GIRL says:

    OKAY REALLY YOU PEOPLE NEED TO STOP WITH THE OH SHE’S A SLUT MOST OF YOU OTHER GIRLS ON HERE HAVE SUCKED TO IM PRETTY SURE WHY DOES IT MATTER SO MUCH TO YOU. SHE IS A HUMAN BEING YOU KNOW EVERYBODY PARTICIPATES IN SEXUAL ACTIVITY IM SURE YOU ALL DID IT AROUND THE SAME AGE TO IT DOESNT MATTER! LEAVE HER ALONE I UNDERSTAND THAT SHE IS A ROLE MODEL FOR LITTLE GIRLS BUT THAT IS WHY YOU TEACH THEM WHAT AND WHAT NOT TO DO. GET A LIFE AND STOP TRYING TO BAG ON HERS!

  7. Tom Anderson says:

    Do you want to change EXIF data? Try the following page of helpful programs http://www.flickr.com/help/forum/2343/

    For the record, I am not a representative of any exif data changing software company.

  8. Michael says:

    I stand by the opinion that the photo is real, despite how outrageous it may seem. Here’s a summary of arguments:

    1) EXIF data: (except for the date and size, same as all other photos Miley took)

    Camera: Research In Motion BlackBerry 9000
    Flash: No flash function
    Focus: At 0mm
    Date: April 9, 2009 1:54:32PM
    File: 1,200 × 1,600 JPEG (1.9 megapixels)
    183,381 bytes (0.17 megabytes) Image compression: 97%

    2) Picture taken at that very night on Miley’s Twitter, with EXIF data proving it – http://img30.imageshack.us/img30/6893/mileyy.jpg. Shows her with the same rosy cheeks and the same hairstyle.

    3) The combination diagram, which the Inquisitr, Paparrazzis, and other websites took as evidence for it being a photoshop, was in fact created by a digg.com user to prove that it is real. Her head’s position is a little different than in those two photos, something that cannot be done in photoshop.

    4) The original photo had TrainReq’s watermark. Sound familiar? Same guy who leaked all the other Miley photos from her e-mail account.

    Oh, I’m sick and tired of misinformation being spread around. Tabloid websites should hire people who actually do research, and not just jump to conclusions.

Leave a Reply