<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Miley Cyrus BJ Photo Is Real, Not Photoshopped? We Hope The Backwards (Update)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hollywoodcelebgossips.com/2009/06/16/miley-cyrus-bj-photo-is-real-not-photoshopped-we-hope-the-backwards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hollywoodcelebgossips.com/2009/06/16/miley-cyrus-bj-photo-is-real-not-photoshopped-we-hope-the-backwards/</link>
	<description>Gossips on Hollywood Celebs or Anyone Who Hits News Headlines for Good or Bad Causes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:02:23 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.hollywoodcelebgossips.com/2009/06/16/miley-cyrus-bj-photo-is-real-not-photoshopped-we-hope-the-backwards/comment-page-1/#comment-7292</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 07:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hollywoodcelebgossips.com/?p=7671#comment-7292</guid>
		<description>I am a Photoshop expert I create all kinds of effects in photos and have years of experience but I could NOT recreate this photo out of the two &quot;PROOF&quot; photos , and the EXIF data cannot be edited in any way I can definately confirm that MILEY herself did take the photo and that it was not a Photoshop if it were a Photoshop then the DATA would say so because it couldn&#039;t be edited</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a Photoshop expert I create all kinds of effects in photos and have years of experience but I could NOT recreate this photo out of the two &#8220;PROOF&#8221; photos , and the EXIF data cannot be edited in any way I can definately confirm that MILEY herself did take the photo and that it was not a Photoshop if it were a Photoshop then the DATA would say so because it couldn&#8217;t be edited</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SOME GIRL</title>
		<link>http://www.hollywoodcelebgossips.com/2009/06/16/miley-cyrus-bj-photo-is-real-not-photoshopped-we-hope-the-backwards/comment-page-1/#comment-5928</link>
		<dc:creator>SOME GIRL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 03:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hollywoodcelebgossips.com/?p=7671#comment-5928</guid>
		<description>OKAY REALLY YOU PEOPLE NEED TO STOP WITH THE OH SHE&#039;S A SLUT MOST OF YOU OTHER GIRLS ON HERE HAVE SUCKED TO IM PRETTY SURE WHY DOES IT MATTER SO MUCH TO YOU. SHE IS A HUMAN BEING YOU KNOW EVERYBODY PARTICIPATES IN SEXUAL ACTIVITY IM SURE YOU ALL DID IT AROUND THE SAME AGE TO IT DOESNT MATTER! LEAVE HER ALONE I UNDERSTAND THAT SHE IS A ROLE MODEL FOR LITTLE GIRLS BUT THAT IS WHY YOU TEACH THEM WHAT AND WHAT NOT TO DO. GET A LIFE AND STOP TRYING TO BAG ON HERS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OKAY REALLY YOU PEOPLE NEED TO STOP WITH THE OH SHE&#8217;S A SLUT MOST OF YOU OTHER GIRLS ON HERE HAVE SUCKED TO IM PRETTY SURE WHY DOES IT MATTER SO MUCH TO YOU. SHE IS A HUMAN BEING YOU KNOW EVERYBODY PARTICIPATES IN SEXUAL ACTIVITY IM SURE YOU ALL DID IT AROUND THE SAME AGE TO IT DOESNT MATTER! LEAVE HER ALONE I UNDERSTAND THAT SHE IS A ROLE MODEL FOR LITTLE GIRLS BUT THAT IS WHY YOU TEACH THEM WHAT AND WHAT NOT TO DO. GET A LIFE AND STOP TRYING TO BAG ON HERS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.hollywoodcelebgossips.com/2009/06/16/miley-cyrus-bj-photo-is-real-not-photoshopped-we-hope-the-backwards/comment-page-1/#comment-5335</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hollywoodcelebgossips.com/?p=7671#comment-5335</guid>
		<description>Do you want to change EXIF data? Try the following page of helpful programs http://www.flickr.com/help/forum/2343/

For the record, I am not a representative of any exif data changing software company.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you want to change EXIF data? Try the following page of helpful programs <a href="http://www.flickr.com/help/forum/2343/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/help/forum/2343/</a></p>
<p>For the record, I am not a representative of any exif data changing software company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.hollywoodcelebgossips.com/2009/06/16/miley-cyrus-bj-photo-is-real-not-photoshopped-we-hope-the-backwards/comment-page-1/#comment-5305</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 00:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hollywoodcelebgossips.com/?p=7671#comment-5305</guid>
		<description>I stand by the opinion that the photo is real, despite how outrageous it may seem. Here&#039;s a summary of arguments:

1) EXIF data: (except for the date and size, same as all other photos Miley took)

Camera: Research In Motion BlackBerry 9000
Flash: No flash function
Focus: At 0mm
Date: April 9, 2009 1:54:32PM
File: 1,200 × 1,600 JPEG (1.9 megapixels)
183,381 bytes (0.17 megabytes) Image compression: 97%

2) Picture taken at that very night on Miley’s Twitter, with EXIF data proving it - http://img30.imageshack.us/img30/6893/mileyy.jpg. Shows her with the same rosy cheeks and the same hairstyle.

3) The combination diagram, which the Inquisitr, Paparrazzis, and other websites took as evidence for it being a photoshop, was in fact created by a digg.com user to prove that it is real. Her head’s position is a little different than in those two photos, something that cannot be done in photoshop.

4) The original photo had TrainReq’s watermark. Sound familiar? Same guy who leaked all the other Miley photos from her e-mail account.

Oh, I’m sick and tired of misinformation being spread around. Tabloid websites should hire people who actually do research, and not just jump to conclusions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I stand by the opinion that the photo is real, despite how outrageous it may seem. Here&#8217;s a summary of arguments:</p>
<p>1) EXIF data: (except for the date and size, same as all other photos Miley took)</p>
<p>Camera: Research In Motion BlackBerry 9000<br />
Flash: No flash function<br />
Focus: At 0mm<br />
Date: April 9, 2009 1:54:32PM<br />
File: 1,200 × 1,600 JPEG (1.9 megapixels)<br />
183,381 bytes (0.17 megabytes) Image compression: 97%</p>
<p>2) Picture taken at that very night on Miley’s Twitter, with EXIF data proving it &#8211; <a href="http://img30.imageshack.us/img30/6893/mileyy.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://img30.imageshack.us/img30/6893/mileyy.jpg</a>. Shows her with the same rosy cheeks and the same hairstyle.</p>
<p>3) The combination diagram, which the Inquisitr, Paparrazzis, and other websites took as evidence for it being a photoshop, was in fact created by a digg.com user to prove that it is real. Her head’s position is a little different than in those two photos, something that cannot be done in photoshop.</p>
<p>4) The original photo had TrainReq’s watermark. Sound familiar? Same guy who leaked all the other Miley photos from her e-mail account.</p>
<p>Oh, I’m sick and tired of misinformation being spread around. Tabloid websites should hire people who actually do research, and not just jump to conclusions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
